Oak is the most aggressively priced provider in this comparison after Embody and WellMedr, and it is one of the few that publishes a like-for-like comparison chart against its competitors. The awkward part is that its own chart does not agree with its own FAQ. The FAQ says programmes start at as little as $119 a month. The comparison chart on the weight-loss page puts Oak’s monthly cost at $190 a month. Both are on the same site, in the same week. Oak also makes the strongest supply claim in the category, that medication is always in stock, and pairs it with one of the strictest non-refundable clauses we have read: once your order reaches the pharmacy you cannot stop it, including by contacting the courier.
Check current Oak pricing Compare all twelve providers
The Oak link above is an affiliate link. The comparison link is not.
What it costs
| What you are buying | Advertised price | What the page actually says |
|---|---|---|
| Compounded GLP-1 (semaglutide) | Programmes from $119/month per the FAQ | No membership fee, free shipping, personalised dosing, B6 or B12 options |
| Compounded GLP-1/GIP (tirzepatide) | Not priced separately on the site | Described as once-weekly, targeting both pathways |
| Oral and peptide options | Not priced separately on the site | Sublingual drops or tablets |
| Oak’s own comparison chart | $190/month | The chart on the weight-loss page contradicts the $119 figure in the FAQ |
| Billing | Recurring subscription | The terms say most prescriptions are configured as subscriptions that renew, in packages covering several weeks |
Take the $119 and the $190 together and the honest reading is that $119 is a floor for a specific plan, most likely a longer prepaid term, and $190 is closer to a representative monthly figure. Oak does not say that anywhere, and it uses the $119 number in the place shoppers read first. If you are comparing providers on annualised cost, which is the only comparison that means anything, that gap is the difference between roughly $1,430 and roughly $2,280 a year. Get the plan-by-plan price list before you pay.
To Oak’s credit, three of its cost claims held up in the documents. There is no membership fee layered on top of the medication. Shipping is free. And the site offers to price-match another provider, which nobody else in this comparison does.
It is a subscription, whatever the front end suggests
The marketing emphasises no long-term commitment. The terms are more specific: most prescriptions are configured as subscriptions that renew on a recurring basis, prescriptions are packaged in several weeks of supply at a time, and Oak will keep charging the card on file until one of five things happens. Those five are your card being declined, your health information changing, a new lab test producing a different prescription, you cancelling the prescription in the portal, or you deleting your account.
Note what is not on that list: telling a support agent you want to stop. The terms route cancellation through the portal or account deletion. If you sign up, find the cancel control in the prescription page of your account before your first renewal is due, and do not rely on a message to the Care Team. Our guide on how to cancel a GLP-1 subscription covers why the method matters if you later dispute a charge.
Always in stock is a claim, not a guarantee
Oak repeats a supply promise across the site: always in stock, same-day shipping, dedicated inventory so you never miss a dose, with pharmacy partners stocking active ingredients independently of brand-name manufacturers. Its comparison chart contrasts this with frequent shortages at brand-name suppliers.
That is a competitive claim about a third-party supply chain, and there is nothing in the terms that backs it. We could not verify it, and we would not treat it as a commitment. It also sits a little awkwardly beside the same page saying dosing is personalised and pharmacies may vary. If continuity of supply is your reason for choosing Oak, ask what happens, in writing, if a compounding pharmacy cannot fill your dose.
The compounding disclosure is unusually candid, and in the wrong document
Oak’s FAQ answer on compounded medication is one of the more honest in this category. It states that compounded versions are not FDA-approved as finished products, that brand-name medications go through FDA approval and standardised manufacturing, and that the difference is preparation by a licensed pharmacy to meet individual needs. It also draws the sensible line between a physician-supervised programme and buying from unverified or international sellers.
The problem is placement. That disclosure lives in a home page FAQ. Oak’s terms of use run to roughly 94,000 characters and do not mention the FDA once. There is no compounding disclaimer next to the price. For what the regulatory distinction actually means, see our guide to compounded versus FDA-approved GLP-1s.
Who runs it
This took longer to establish than it should have. The site copyright names Leaf Longevity Holdings Corp, doing business as Oak Longevity. The messaging consent block on the same page names three different companies whose communications you are agreeing to receive: Oak Longevity Holdings Corp, Flow Longevity Holdings Corp and Mito Health Holdings Corp, described as affiliated brands. So the brand you buy from, the entity that owns the site and the entities that may contact you are not the same names.
A clinic phone number is published, along with a LegitScript listing link, a privacy policy and a separate remote health consent document, which is more than several competitors here provide. Approval is offered without a video call, which is fast but means your entire clinical assessment may be a form.
Oak also publishes an unusually clear list of who it will not treat: under 18s, anyone pregnant or nursing, and anyone with a BMI under 22 and no related conditions. Publishing exclusion criteria before intake is good practice and rare in this category.
Who this suits, and who it does not
Who Oak is a reasonable fit for
- Cost-led buyers who will actually pin down which plan costs $119 and which costs $190 before paying.
- People who want no membership fee, free shipping and a price-match offer rather than a bundled subscription fee.
- Patients who want a compounding explanation written in plain language, and published exclusion criteria they can check against themselves before starting.
- Anyone who prefers a form-based approval with no video call and same-day turnaround.
Who should look elsewhere
- You want one published price. The FAQ and the site own comparison chart disagree by $71 a month.
- You want the ability to stop a shipment you have changed your mind about. Oak’s terms specifically pre-empt cancelling with the courier or the pharmacy.
- You want to cancel by contacting support. The terms route cancellation through the account portal or account deletion.
- You are choosing Oak because medication is always in stock. That claim is not supported anywhere in the terms and we could not verify it.
- You want the compounding status stated next to the price rather than in a home page FAQ.
- You want a refund window that survives prescription approval. See our Trimi Health review for the most consumer-friendly exit in this comparison.
Affiliate link. Verify every figure on the provider’s own site before you pay. Pricing and policy pages in this category change without notice.
Compare this against the rest of the market
One provider in isolation tells you very little. These pages run a single variable across all twelve companies we track.
- Cheapest GLP-1 telehealth in 2026 — every plan annualised on its real billing interval.
- Compounded semaglutide prices compared
- Compounded tirzepatide prices compared
- Who bills once, who bills forever — charges per year range from one to about 17.4.
- Refund and cancellation policies compared
- Oral and sublingual GLP-1 providers compared
- Fourteen red flags to check before you pay
- The full twelve-provider comparison table
How we sourced this
The $119 figure, the price-match offer, the supply claims and the compounding explanation were read from the Oak home page FAQ. The $190 figure, the competitor comparison chart, the product range and the same-day shipping claims were read from its weight-loss page. The subscription structure, the five conditions under which billing stops, the refund and cancellation policy and the clause covering courier and pharmacy intervention were read from its published terms of use, which we also checked for any mention of the FDA. The operating entity, the affiliated companies named in the messaging consent, the clinic phone number and the LegitScript listing were read from the site footer. Exclusion criteria were read from the home page. Everything was read on the date at the top of this page. We have not been through checkout, we have not tested cancellation and we have not verified the inventory claim. Terms change without notice, so verify before you buy.
Medical note
This is consumer purchasing information, not medical advice. Speak with a licensed clinician who knows your history before starting, stopping or switching a prescription. See our medical disclaimer.